Technical complexity and innovation of the project: An assessment of how complex and innovative a solution has been proposed to improve the Acki Nacki protocol;
Practical value: An assessment of how the proposed improvement can be useful and applicable to the Acki Nacki community;
Quality of implementation: An assessment of how well and effectively the proposed improvement has been implemented, including code, documentation and testing;
Security level: Assessment of the security of the proposed improvement, including data processing, vulnerability protection and compliance with cryptography standards;
Potential for future development: An assessment of how much the proposed improvement can be further developed and supported in future versions of the Acki Nacki protocol;
Demonstration of work: An assessment of how well the team has demonstrated the work of its improvement through prototypes, presentations and other means;
Compliance with the tasks of the hackathon: An assessment of how the proposed improvement corresponds to the tasks and goals of the hackathon described in the original post.

Judge Panel